<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Get Smart. Get Solomon on franchising</title>
	<atom:link href="http://lesstewart.wordpress.com/2008/07/14/solomon-on-franchise-scoundrels/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://lesstewart.wordpress.com/2008/07/14/solomon-on-franchise-scoundrels/</link>
	<description>Understanding franchsing by Les Stewart</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 28 May 2012 16:12:55 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Coffee Culture: likely legit or a FranWhack? &#171; FranchiseFool</title>
		<link>http://lesstewart.wordpress.com/2008/07/14/solomon-on-franchise-scoundrels/#comment-1370</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Coffee Culture: likely legit or a FranWhack? &#171; FranchiseFool]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 29 Apr 2010 09:02:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://lesstewart.wordpress.com/?p=321#comment-1370</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] is it what Richard Solomon defines as a FranWhack? [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] is it what Richard Solomon defines as a FranWhack? [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Carol Cross</title>
		<link>http://lesstewart.wordpress.com/2008/07/14/solomon-on-franchise-scoundrels/#comment-169</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Carol Cross]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 14 Jul 2008 16:57:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://lesstewart.wordpress.com/?p=321#comment-169</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[As the wife of a failed The  UPS Store  franchisee,  I have been educated by the honest and  no BS tutorials of  Richard Solomon of Franchise Remedies, the writings and  insight of  Les Stewart of Franchise Fool,  and Paul Steinberg,  author of &quot;Beguiling Heresy,&quot;  an excellent study of the franchisee-franchisor relationship and the status quo of the law under captured regulatory policy.   I also read Canada&#039;s Michael Webster  whose own research is dedicated to warning prospective franchisees about the rampant fraud and dangers  in the industry of franchising.       

Richard Solomon&#039;s &quot;Fran Whack&quot;  is probably the best &quot;due diligence&quot; vehicle in franchising today  for those who are about to sign a long-term  contract that will change their lives forever.   (And,  if the odds were known,  the odds would not be good that this will be a rewarding change.) 

There IS cooperation in the status quo to hide the very great dangers of 
franchising from  franchisees and to promote franchises as a safe solution to &quot;a business of your own&quot;  that will provide a job,  as well as profits.          

 &quot;Fran Whack&quot;  is a negative consult only  and if there are negatives,  Richard Solomon will find them,  and then the prospective franchisee can weigh the positives against the negatives and make an &quot;informed&quot; decision.  

 Richard Solomon is not altruistic and works both sides of the fence in franchising but I believe that  he priced the negative &quot;Fran Whack&quot; at only $1,000 originally with the view that both those prospects who did their own due diligence and those who used their own general attorneys (who were not experts in franchising) would greatly benefit from a &quot;negative&quot; consult before they put their signature to a long-term franchise agreement  that could change their lives for the worse,  and from which there is little change of recovery.      .         

Every prospective franchisee who thinks thay have found an answer to their problems of  a job and income needs a negative consult with an expert who will concentrate only on the negatives of the purchase for the purchaser  and who has no conflict of interest when assessing the negatives of the purchase.   Richard Solomon pointed out that so often a prospect&#039;s own attorney may not be qualified to assess the risk of the investment for his client and that the clients often  are not willing to pay for anything other than a &quot;reading&quot; of the &quot;contract&quot;  and are not willing to pay their attorney for investigation and vetting of the purchase?     

In franchising,  it is very dangerous to &quot;Accentuate the Positive and Eliminate the Negative&quot;  -----LET THE BUYER BEWARE!]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>As the wife of a failed The  UPS Store  franchisee,  I have been educated by the honest and  no BS tutorials of  Richard Solomon of Franchise Remedies, the writings and  insight of  Les Stewart of Franchise Fool,  and Paul Steinberg,  author of &#8220;Beguiling Heresy,&#8221;  an excellent study of the franchisee-franchisor relationship and the status quo of the law under captured regulatory policy.   I also read Canada&#8217;s Michael Webster  whose own research is dedicated to warning prospective franchisees about the rampant fraud and dangers  in the industry of franchising.       </p>
<p>Richard Solomon&#8217;s &#8220;Fran Whack&#8221;  is probably the best &#8220;due diligence&#8221; vehicle in franchising today  for those who are about to sign a long-term  contract that will change their lives forever.   (And,  if the odds were known,  the odds would not be good that this will be a rewarding change.) </p>
<p>There IS cooperation in the status quo to hide the very great dangers of<br />
franchising from  franchisees and to promote franchises as a safe solution to &#8220;a business of your own&#8221;  that will provide a job,  as well as profits.          </p>
<p> &#8220;Fran Whack&#8221;  is a negative consult only  and if there are negatives,  Richard Solomon will find them,  and then the prospective franchisee can weigh the positives against the negatives and make an &#8220;informed&#8221; decision.  </p>
<p> Richard Solomon is not altruistic and works both sides of the fence in franchising but I believe that  he priced the negative &#8220;Fran Whack&#8221; at only $1,000 originally with the view that both those prospects who did their own due diligence and those who used their own general attorneys (who were not experts in franchising) would greatly benefit from a &#8220;negative&#8221; consult before they put their signature to a long-term franchise agreement  that could change their lives for the worse,  and from which there is little change of recovery.      .         </p>
<p>Every prospective franchisee who thinks thay have found an answer to their problems of  a job and income needs a negative consult with an expert who will concentrate only on the negatives of the purchase for the purchaser  and who has no conflict of interest when assessing the negatives of the purchase.   Richard Solomon pointed out that so often a prospect&#8217;s own attorney may not be qualified to assess the risk of the investment for his client and that the clients often  are not willing to pay for anything other than a &#8220;reading&#8221; of the &#8220;contract&#8221;  and are not willing to pay their attorney for investigation and vetting of the purchase?     </p>
<p>In franchising,  it is very dangerous to &#8220;Accentuate the Positive and Eliminate the Negative&#8221;  &#8212;&#8211;LET THE BUYER BEWARE!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

