Some professionals hold fast to their word.
They continue to practice with integrity, dignity, grace and humour, often under extreme conditions.
If faced with insurmountable economic hardships, they choose to leave a field rather than sell-out their principles.
Bev Cline writing for the Globe and Mail attributes the following excerpt to a Sotos LLP partner:
Another concern is that franchisors will essentially be asked “to crystal ball gaze” into the future in creating the educational document, says Allan Dick, a franchise lawyer at Sotos LLP in Toronto. “Currently a franchisor has to disclose, through the disclosure document [as mandated by the Arthur Wishart Act], everything that is material to the opportunity,” says Dick. The disclosure document, he points out, “is not a ‘general’ document; it’s a very specific document for a specific opportunity for a specific franchise.”
So, in terms of the proposed educational document, Dick asks: “If the franchisee is relying on a franchisor who is being forced [in the educational document] to crystal-ball-gaze into the future, to provide information that the franchisor could not know, will this benefit the prospective franchisee?”
The point is that prospective franchisees’ immediate interest and goal is to “look for the best opportunity they can find to be successful in business,” says Dick.
The implied threat to politicians, always sensitive to job loss or creation, is in the last sentence.
In addition, if franchisors are held liable for predicting business prospects in an unrealistic way, says Dick, they may be reluctant to enter into certain markets in the first place.
Who are you going to trust?
— Thanks to This Isn’t Happiness