Franchise gag orders are CRITICAL to maintaining abusive commercial relationships.

January 25, 2020

Between the franchisee and family versus the franchisor’s and franchisee’s lawyer, franchise banker (especially predatory lending), landlords, and suppliers.

Non-disc;losure contracts make a mockery of pre-sale due diligence by prospective franchisees.

Creates inevitable fraud by exiting franchisee.

Disclosure: I’ve never signed one.

Why is Lick’s Homeburgers & Ice Cream being killed off by its franchisor?

June 29, 2013

What franchisor sends this message to the retail market?

Licks valued customer

Is it in acting in bad faith by destroying all existing Lick’s franchisees’ equity?

  • Who would buy any of these outlets?


Media coverage:

The franchise bar, with perfect foreknowledge, will take what is left of their money in what will be (in the end) a hopelessly futile attempt at legal justice in Ontario. Talk to your premier and your small business loan provider not your a franchise lawyer.

Can Lease irregularities cause a System to Dissolve?

February 4, 2009


This is a very good question.

My quick answer would be: It depends on how smart franchisees are versus the klutz'(s) bluster.

Franchise systems don’t explode from lawsuits or adverse publicity: They simply get collapsed with the franchisees’ money spirited away.

No franchisor fights to protect a loser trademark: It’s too cheap to build another. What’s a franchisor anyway: A telephone, some contracts and a bunch of second-rate guards.

There are 3 types of franchisees:

  1. the happy (happy with ROI, debts paid),
  2. the touch-and-go (barely ok), and
  3. the desperate (hemorrhaging cash daily: they want out).

Principle: If the leasing arrangements are filthy enough, a group of #3 franchisees could band together to have a s.o.b. franchise lawyer negotiate their exit (releases: both ways).

For example: Let’s say 30 recruiting franchisees chipped in, say, $3,000 to buy their permanent freedom (out of the industry).

Question: How would the other stakeholders likely react?

Franchisees #1 & #2: Some may join the exit group but most would hate what #3 is doing. They would apply huge pressure on the franchisor to let them go, with no strings attached. They realize that head office are scum but don’t want to risk thier trademark being dragged through the mud.

Leasing Company(ies): There are two kinds that are confusingly named:

(1) The kind that signs up the fresh meat. They are really a subcontracted marketing arm of the franchisor, created to fold up like a cheap suit when the fraud sausage explodes. Under any half-assed franchise law they would be considered a franchisor associate and be held legally responsible for all of their misrepresentations. They provide the franchisor’s TLC.

(2) A leasing collection company that didn’t count on a blog to expose a ticking fraud bomb. They bought illegal leases (mixed intangible with tangible assets: this is illegal). (1) goes on to sell the next sucker into future bankruptcy while (2) looks like Bambi on FranchiseFool’s highway. The lease can be assigned an infinite number of times depending on which frontier is crossed.

Being confronted, both (1) and (2) would shut up and never take action, especially since the franchisor and a lease company share office space.

This is reinforced when a little birdy told me that a franchisee simply walked away (no lease payment, no royalty) in October 2008 (no attempt to call or collect). Also they realize that the exiting group could turn around and sue them into the 22nd century for using capital leases to finance intangible assets. IRS issues, folks.

Franchisor: They’ll sign the release papers that the group’s lawyer presents in very short order. They will have received hundreds of emails and telephone calls. The franchisees #1. & #2. (who are actually still paying royalties since sales have dried up) will grab them by the short and curlies and impress upon them their desire for the franchisor to play this straight (a first in their God-forsaken life).

It would be unnecessary for a franchisee advocate to ever have to reveal who’s who in this hypothetical scenario. No fuss, no muss. Look the other way as a few slip under the wire and head for the forest.

Of course everything’s cool unless anyone is ever, even unintentionally or remotely, threatened for exercising their freedom of speech rights.

If you want out,  just let me know.

Lease agreements: Challenging the contract’s validity

February 1, 2009

housecards4Franchising sometimes works very well for investors.

Sometimes not so well.

Canadian franchises are almost 100% financed through 6 national banks. The vast majority of the debt financing is through a federal guaranteed loan program.  That is after your life savings (redundancy package) and love money are put into the pot.

  • I will be looking much more closely at the lease financing arrangements in the United States in the next little while.

Principle: Some lease contracts and their accompanying personal guarantees are void (ie. unenforceable by a Court and you get the $ back) because they are judged to be:

  1. unconscionable and/or
  2. have “mixed” asset types which is a violation of commercial laws.

In addition some lease contracts maybe in violation of “normal” state usury laws or franchise-specific statutes.

Everyone keeps paying their lease, assuming that it is a valid contract that they will be forced to pay if they challenge the validity of the agreement. Guess again.

The more I look, there are lots of very sloppy and very questionable leases out there.

To Do

  1. Every franchisee should get out their lease papers.
  2. Find out what company has their lease.
  3. Note: When it started, when it ends and the monthly payment.

Stay tuned as I bring forward some information that has a direct bearing on thousands of U.S. franchisees in these tough times.

%d bloggers like this: